Going by ethos, my first instinct is to not trust anything published by the Environmental Working Group. Their previous publications (their work on BPA, for example) fail to grasp that just because something is detectable doesn't mean that it's toxic. Everything's a chemical: whether is a nutrient, a toxin, a carcinogen, a nutraceutical, etc., is going to depend on the dose.
Going by ethos, my first instinct is to not trust anything published by the Environmental Working Group. Their previous publications (their work on BPA, for example) fail to grasp that just because something is detectable doesn't mean that it's toxic. Everything's a chemical: whether is a nutrient, a toxin, a carcinogen, a nutraceutical, etc., is going to depend on the dose.
ReplyDelete